Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matija Pecotic vs Guilherme Clezar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pecotic vs Clezar analysis and find out who is favored!
Matija Pecotic vs Guilherme Clezar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pecotic 1 - 0 Clezar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pecotic has won 51.14% of points on their second serve, while Clezar has won 23.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pecotic, in recent form, has won 48.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Clezar has won 33.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.67% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pecotic has saved 58.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clezar has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pecotic has won 57.69% of matches played (W/L 15/ 11), with Clezar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pecotic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 155/ 52), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Clezar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 286/ 239), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Pecotic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 12/ 8), where as Clezar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pecotic winning 1 times and Clezar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pecotic winning 2 and Clezar winning 0. The last match between Pecotic and Clezar was at the Gatineau Challenger, 12-08-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Matija Pecotic getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pecotic and Clezar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pecotic winning 0 times and Clezar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pecotic winning 0, and Clezar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pecotic has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.5 while Clezar has played against players with an average rank of 491.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pecotic has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clezar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pecotic has converted 48.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clezar has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
495
Rank
206
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
878
Rank
153
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
69% (212-96)
Career Total W/L
53% (338-305)
50% (7-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$49,830
Career Prize Money
$133,123
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matija Pecotic | Guilherme Clezar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:3 | 1:23:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (39/61) | 63% (36/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (29/39) | 61% (22/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (11/22) | 38% (8/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (27/57) | 34% (21/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Matija Pecotic
Player
Guilherme Clezar
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matija Pecotic | Guilherme Clezar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (18/14) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (156/129) | 14% (2/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:2 | 1:18:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.14 | 491 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (513/908) | 70% (40/57) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (351/513) | 48% (19/40) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (202/395) | 24% (4/17) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (51/106) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (402/920) | 33% (17/51) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Matija Pecotic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilgiz Valiev
Player
Matija Pecotic
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matija Pecotic
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Preston Brown
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Aydan Gomez Osorio
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Evan Bynoe
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Guilherme Clezar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Guilherme Clezar
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Guilherme Clezar
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guilherme Clezar
Player
Enrique Bogo
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guilherme Clezar
Player
Arklon Huertas Del Pino
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Guilherme Clezar
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Guilherme Clezar
73%
(
77 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Guilherme Clezar
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Guilherme Clezar
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guilherme Clezar
Player
Hernan Casanova
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
83%
(
64 of
77)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Guilherme Clezar
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pecotic Vs Clezar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
